Skip to content
HarborPlay

The Most Disappointing Video Games of This Year, Per Aggregate Scores

At every turn, gamers are quick to share their lists of the top games of 2025. But what about the stinkers, the low achievers? Let's take a moment to recognize the most panned games of the year, according to review aggregator Metacritic. Are all of these games as bad as the ratings suggest? We shall see.

10. Switch 2's Welcome Tour

Metascore: 54/100, User Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this showcase title were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many voicing frustration it wasn't a complimentary title like competing console launches. Reviewer sentiment spanned a wide spectrum, from harsh disappointment to more generous takes that highlighted the polished software itself. In spite of the controversy, the title proved to be a notable seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Marketed as "beyond a racing game," this driving sim from studios in Germany and Poland was met with largely negative reviews. Reviews pointed out that the game fell short in key areas, especially in a year featuring high-quality racing titles. For many, this disappointing sim was best left on the shelf.

8. The Purrfect Bubsy Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the confusing colon usage is a silly annoyance. This collection of SNES and PS1 platforming games revives a sarcastic feline known for incessant hacky one-liners. Reviewers noted that these games haven't aged well to begin with and haven't gotten better with age. The surprisingly strong user score stands as a baffling anomaly to the critical reception.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Aggregate Score: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This *Hunter x Hunter* brawler faced widespread disappointment from both critics and players. Issues included a small fighter lineup and a severe lack of features. Player sentiment was particularly negative, with some stating a desire that the title's poor performance would be a warning for similar releases.

6. Neptunia Riders Vs Dogoos

Metascore: 51, User Score: 5.3

Hailing from the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this bike-riding title tasks players with rounding up slime-like creatures. Reviewers felt that its effort to channel a rolling-collection feel didn't land, coming across as more of a quick spin-off than a worthy series entry. Its short length combined with a full retail cost was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Aggregate Score: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the past, finally released after a very long time in development hell. The developers opted to release the game as an authentic experience of its time, acknowledging that contemporary players might dislike its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews noted that the interesting history of its development was far richer than the end product.

4. Scar-Lead Salvation

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-art third-person shooter inspired by games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. Frequent criticisms were repetitive adversaries, repetitive levels, and a forgettable story. A much-criticized system involving the character's attire was widely panned and detracted from the game's overall experience.

3. Ambulance Life: A Paramedic Simulator

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Think of the strategic medical sims of the past, then take out the compelling story. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Critics found the ambulance-driving sequences to be a slog, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being poorly executed. The overall experience was deemed not very compelling.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Metascore: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This shift away from the classic digital companion formula turns the franchise into a town-management title. The result, based on critics, was a vapid series of basic activities that quickly overstayed its welcome. Some reviews went so far as to label it one of the worst titles available on its platform, pointing to a profound lack of engaging content.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, User Score: 2.5

Intended to be a high-profile open-world action game from a team featuring industry veterans, *MindsEye* was a catastrophic critical flop. Reviews universally panned its lousy combat, uninspired storytelling, and a host of game-breaking glitches. Several found it to be a significant step back compared to previous-generation games in the similar style. Among the scathing reviews, a small handful of positive user reviews found value in the experience, providing a distinct contrast.

The writer

Lisa Abbott

A passionate gamer and tech writer with over a decade of experience covering indie and AAA titles across multiple platforms.

HarborPlay

Type to search articles.